Women in Jewish magazines

[shlonx]

http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/who-needs-rabbinic-leadership-a-call-for-orthodox-organizations-to-heed-the-voices-of-the-women-they-cannot-see/

[ChaimMoskowitz]

Voted.

[yoohoo]

Too general. As in advertisement material? I would say yes but with very strict guidelines

[ChaimMoskowitz]

Who's the 4 sexist so far in the poll?

[shlonx]

Too general. As in advertisement material? I would say yes but with very strict guidelines

How about a profile picture of an interveiwee?

[ExGingi]

Who's the 4 sexist so far in the poll?

Voted.

Why are you assuming anyone is sexist? Why name calling?

[mgarfin]

Anything we want to change we need to answer these questions
Are we saying we were wrong up until now?
Did the halacha change or was it only chasidus? What would it not apply anymore.

[ChaimMoskowitz]

Why are you assuming anyone is sexist?

You do have a point. If they didn't allow blacks I guess that isn't racist. 

[aygart]

The big issue will be that there is no way these publications could make anyone happy with defining tznius.

[Dan]

The big issue will be that there is no way these publications could make anyone happy with defining tznius.

Why not?
Speak to appropriate LORs and make a known guideline.

[ChaimMoskowitz]

The big issue will be that there is no way these publications could make anyone happy with defining tznius.

So that is why they don't have pictures of girls/women?

[aygart]

Why not?
Speak to appropriate LORs and make a known guideline.

Much of tznius is subjective. Anyone who thinks it is a bunch of lines missed the boat.

[aygart]

So that is why they don't have pictures of girls/women?

It is definitely the easy way out to avoid having a big advertiser submit an ad which may be suggestive even with all lines kept to and have to deal with explaining to the advertiser why the ad they spent money on making doesn't meet the standards.

[Dan]

It is definitely the easy way out to avoid having a big advertiser submit an ad which may be suggestive even with all lines kept to and have to deal with explaining to the advertiser why the ad they spent money on making doesn't meet the standards.

Sounds better than this:

[ChaimMoskowitz]

It is definitely the easy way out to avoid having a big advertiser submit an ad which may be suggestive even with all lines kept to and have to deal with explaining to the advertiser why the ad they spent money on making doesn't meet the standards.

I understand it is an easy way out but I am asking is that the real reason they have no pictures of girls/women.