Kennedy Replacement DDF Shortlist

[aygart]

(is it something along the lines of 2bm/3bm/etc?)

this

[ExGingi]

Going to pass on this one.

Wow. Someone's admitting defeat.

[ChaimMoskowitz]

Wow. Someone's admitting defeat.

It will result it pitting religions against each other. Not my style.
The GIF was a nice touch!

[aygart]

It will result it pitting religions against each other. Not my style.

Catholicism believes in physical immortality on a mass scale in current times?

[ChaimMoskowitz]

Catholicism believes in physical immortality on a mass scale in current times?

LOL

[thaber]

...a person of liberal views.
A political and moral philosophy based on liberty and equality.

With that definition most conservatives are liberals
Here's the dictionary definition :

lib·er·al

ˈlib(ə)rəl/

adjective

1.

open to new behavior or opinions and willing to discard traditional values.

"they have more liberal views toward marriage and divorce than some people"

[ChaimMoskowitz]

With that definition most conservatives are liberals

I don't think so. Some how equality and conservatives don't go together.

[thaber]

I don't think so. Some how equality and conservatives don't go together.

See edit above

[aygart]

I don't think so. Some how equality and conservatives don't go together.

Dog whistle

[ChaimMoskowitz]

Dog whistle

No dog whistle. Conservatives talk a good equality story.

[ExGingi]

I don't think so. Some how equality and conservatives don't go together.

You have something about immortality going on this evening.

Six foot under all are equal.

So following your reasoning. A conservative court isn't pro equality, as it could lead to instantaneous immortality, thereby eternalizing inequality.

[justaregularguy]

I’m a little surprised with the choice- he sort of made the cheer-leaders happy ( Fox News) but other than that didn’t please too many other people. Liberals hate everything trump does even before he does it and on the other side of the aisle mark Levine had some precautionary things to say- careful not to outright reject him but called for serious vetting etc.
I wonder why POTUS couldn’t try his luck at Garrett maybe which would def have got his base excited (to be completely honest I don’t know a lot about them just what I understand she was a better fit for trumps base I believe) and if she got rejected he still had time to nominate kavanaugh..

[ChaimMoskowitz]

I’m a little surprised with the choice- he sort of made the cheer-leaders happy ( Fox News) but other than that didn’t please too many other people. Liberals hate everything trump does even before he does it and on the other side of the aisle mark Levine had some precautionary things to say- careful not to outright reject him but called for serious vetting etc.
I wonder why POTUS couldn’t try his luck at Garrett maybe which would def have got his base excited (to be completely honest I don’t know a lot about them just what I understand she was a better fit for trumps base I believe) and if she got rejected he still had time to nominate kavanaugh..

Garrett was dead in the water. Trump can't accept defeat.

[shapsam]

Trump can't accept defeat.

Why would ANYONE nominate someone that can't make it?

[justaregularguy]

Garrett was dead in the water. Trump can't accept defeat.

that may have been but he should have proven to his base that he tried-.....ahh but maybe he was willing to take the heat by not choosing her rather than the blame fall on the senators who would vote no and lose the senate in November is a thought... his supporters are more loyal to him than to many senators possibly

[ChaimMoskowitz]

that may have been but he should have proven to his base that he tried-.....ahh but maybe he was willing to take the heat by not choosing her rather than the blame fall on the senators who would vote no and lose the senate in November is a thought... his supporters are more loyal to him than to many senators possibly

His pick is probably the most conservative judge besides Thomas.

[Yammer]

Would it be fair to say the liberal leaning justices reflect more the thinking on the country?

I don't think so.

Even when dizzy from all the codes, fonts and sizes, I can confirm that until we reach the גאולה האמיתית והשלימה, people will indeed die if judge Kavanaugh is confirmed (and same is true even if he isn't confirmed).

Lol

I’m a little surprised with the choice- he sort of made the cheer-leaders happy ( Fox News) but other than that didn’t please too many other people. Liberals hate everything trump does even before he does it and on the other side of the aisle mark Levine had some precautionary things to say- careful not to outright reject him but called for serious vetting etc.
I wonder why POTUS couldn’t try his luck at Garrett maybe which would def have got his base excited (to be completely honest I don’t know a lot about them just what I understand she was a better fit for trumps base I believe) and if she got rejected he still had time to nominate kavanaugh..

Whether you agree with him or not, why would he nominate a middle of the mill R if he can get a conservative?

His pick is probably the most conservative judge besides Thomas.

According to the axios article posted above that correct

[Boruch999]

I’m a little surprised with the choice- he sort of made the cheer-leaders happy ( Fox News) but other than that didn’t please too many other people. Liberals hate everything trump does even before he does it and on the other side of the aisle mark Levine had some precautionary things to say- careful not to outright reject him but called for serious vetting etc.
I wonder why POTUS couldn’t try his luck at Garrett maybe which would def have got his base excited (to be completely honest I don’t know a lot about them just what I understand she was a better fit for trumps base I believe) and if she got rejected he still had time to nominate kavanaugh..

Garrett was dead in the water. Trump can't accept defeat.

that may have been but he should have proven to his base that he tried-.....ahh but maybe he was willing to take the heat by not choosing her rather than the blame fall on the senators who would vote no and lose the senate in November is a thought... his supporters are more loyal to him than to many senators possibly

I don't think so.LolWhether you agree with him or not, why would he nominate a middle of the mill R if he can get a conservative?According to the axios article posted above that correct

@justaregularguy means Amy Barret not Garland.

[aygart]

I’m a little surprised with the choice- he sort of made the cheer-leaders happy ( Fox News) but other than that didn’t please too many other people. Liberals hate everything trump does even before he does it and on the other side of the aisle mark Levine had some precautionary things to say- careful not to outright reject him but called for serious vetting etc.
I wonder why POTUS couldn’t try his luck at Garrett maybe which would def have got his base excited (to be completely honest I don’t know a lot about them just what I understand she was a better fit for trumps base I believe) and if she got rejected he still had time to nominate kavanaugh..

Harriet Miers

[aygart]

that may have been but he should have proven to his base that he tried-.....ahh but maybe he was willing to take the heat by not choosing her rather than the blame fall on the senators who would vote no and lose the senate in November is a thought... his supporters are more loyal to him than to many senators possibly

Trump does not do things to show he tried and is not so well calculated politically (we can say that here-we are not talking about Russia)