Author Topic: PSA: Don't swipe recklessly for others  (Read 229254 times)

Offline 4yourinfo

  • Dansdeals Gold Elite
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2013
  • Posts: 230
  • Total likes: 13
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 3
    • View Profile
  • Location: usa
Re: PSA: Don't swipe recklessly for others
« Reply #3555 on: June 16, 2019, 01:25:34 AM »
Except that all cards specify that you don't get points and must pay interest for cash or cash equivalents.
Interestingly I said back in March they should file chargebacks based on not getting the agreed "service"  with the service being getting their bills paid.. They should claim the arrangement was a service that was not rendered.

Offline Don Will

  • Dansdeals Gold Elite
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2014
  • Posts: 102
  • Total likes: 13
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 0
    • View Profile
  • Location: Ny
Re: PSA: Don't swipe recklessly for others
« Reply #3556 on: June 16, 2019, 08:57:45 AM »
Interestingly I said back in March they should file chargebacks based on not getting the agreed "service"  with the service being getting their bills paid.. They should claim the arrangement was a service that was not rendered.
I guess they should have hired you as their attorney

Offline knowitall

  • Dansdeals Platinum Elite + Lifetime Silver Elite
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2013
  • Posts: 589
  • Total likes: 27
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 0
    • View Profile
  • Location: 08701
Re: PSA: Don't swipe recklessly for others
« Reply #3557 on: June 16, 2019, 09:52:05 AM »
Actually they do.
Not really, legally speaking they only need to give a reason which can be extremely vague, like “misuse” “abuse” “not used as intended” or “credit risk”.

Offline as2

  • Dansdeals Presidential Platinum Elite
  • ********
  • Join Date: Mar 2013
  • Posts: 4804
  • Total likes: 510
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 21
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: PSA: Don't swipe recklessly for others
« Reply #3558 on: June 16, 2019, 11:22:20 AM »
Not really, legally speaking they only need to give a reason which can be extremely vague, like “misuse” “abuse” “not used as intended” or “credit risk”.
Correct, but if they provide a reason like that, you can sue if they can't provide any proof backing that claim.
Memories last forever, make them while you can.

Online CountValentine

  • Dansdeals Presidential Platinum Elite
  • ********
  • Join Date: Mar 2013
  • Posts: 4110
  • Total likes: 48
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Location: Poland
  • Programs: DAOTYA
Re: PSA: Don't swipe recklessly for others
« Reply #3559 on: June 16, 2019, 02:33:28 PM »
Not really, legally speaking they only need to give a reason which can be extremely vague, like “misuse” “abuse” “not used as intended” or “credit risk”.
Most if not all the ones you listed are non-compliant.
REPOST!!!!!

Offline zale

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Platinum Elite
  • *******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 1105
  • Total likes: 180
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 3
    • View Profile
  • Location: Brooklyn, NY
Re: PSA: Don't swipe recklessly for others
« Reply #3560 on: June 16, 2019, 09:50:26 PM »
Stop wasting your time. It's not.

$6,811,445,84.

Case is almost certainly a loser.

How do you see this going down?

Offline zale

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Platinum Elite
  • *******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 1105
  • Total likes: 180
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 3
    • View Profile
  • Location: Brooklyn, NY
Re: PSA: Don't swipe recklessly for others
« Reply #3561 on: June 16, 2019, 09:51:57 PM »
Interestingly I said back in March they should file chargebacks based on not getting the agreed "service"  with the service being getting their bills paid.. They should claim the arrangement was a service that was not rendered.

The result would have been the same. The merchants would have made the same counter-arguments.

Offline simple26

  • DansDeals Copper Elite
  • *
  • Join Date: Jul 2018
  • Posts: 1
  • Total likes: 1
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 0
    • View Profile
Re: PSA: Don't swipe recklessly for others
« Reply #3562 on: June 27, 2019, 08:52:11 PM »
If someone was still doubting whether Twerski was the lawyer for sterling.........
https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docIndex=gnQ2Eh1e_PLUS_Ow3g6L/vNRaGg==