TL;DW
I would honestly want to watch this, but he lost me after saying a bunch of rubbish in the first few minutes. I'll listen to tantalizing brain food for an hour, but not a bunch of cheap out-of-context nitpicking of some of a brilliant person's weakest lines and portraying them as his greatest mantras.
Just one example of something that turned me off in the first minutes (so that I'm not guilty of arguing empty claims), he said he'll debate Ben but not in front of cameras. Why not? His given reason doesn't make any sense. If ideas are superior, why does the camera make it any less worthy?