Question for the lawyers in the house:
I bought a house a year ago. Seller wrote on disclosure that roof hadn't been worked on since seller bought the house (11 years ago). Also, seller wrote that he is not aware of any leaks. Inspector didn't notice anything as well.
A week ago we had a leak that a roofer and handyman noticed right away had been a recurring issue and was repeatedly patched up (inside and outside), as recently as 2 years ago. We patched up the roof and interior for $750.
My question whether I have a case to go after seller/inspector to replace that section of the roof (~$8k, including replacing siding by roof). Would not be worth it to go after for just the patch costs.