Have not seen any mention of this.
You need to get out more
Sean Hannity, Maria Bartiromo & Jeanine Pirro: Top TV Stars Tipped To Be FIRED In Rupert Murdoch ‘Blood Sacrifice’ Over Fox News Election Lies Scandalhttps://www.msn.com/en-us/entertainment/news/sean-hannity-maria-bartiromo-jeanine-pirro-top-tv-stars-tipped-to-be-fired-in-rupert-murdoch-blood-sacrifice-over-fox-news-election-lies-scandal/ar-AA188wAk?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=9b3e4c33d56a4b90ab69a740342687b0&ei=9
Is there a thread? Please point me to it.
Were other details about this Dominion case discussed previously somewhere on the forum?
Opinion: Fox News was never a real news networkhttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/opinion-fox-news-was-never-a-real-news-network/ar-AA188Rci?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=38208a4331bb49189f69112073b77351&ei=13
Are we supposed to be impressed?
says msn
Quotes in a signature is annoying, as it comes across as an independent post.
What you should do is look at the info. This lawsuit has nothing to do with the D's. It is about knowingly putting out false information over and over.
This has the same issue as the Trump impeachment.Dems has been screaming wolf for years and years, amplifying non-issues and yelling their faces blue. Now they claim they are morally right for a new massive issue.Are we supposed to be impressed?
“nothing to do with the D’s” except that “knowingly putting out false information over and over “ is a D tactic practiced intensely over the entire Trump presidency and post Jan 6.
Is this the best you can come up with? “I’m ignoring this story because “orange man bad” (or in this case “Dems bad”)”
Try and look at the facts in the case and leave politics out of. If you do that and say there is no there there then that is fine.
I am pointing out how there is an outcry when one side pushes untrue claims but the other side gets a free pass
Maybe that is just how you see it?
The outcries are just from opposite sides.