It is a territory that belongs to the USA but isn’t actually part of the USA.
False. Other than the fact that it's technically a territory and not a state, it is as much part of the United States as Nebraska is.
When it comes to counting countries visited, many would use the ISO-3166-1 standard (here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_and_dependencies_by_population)
The most common list used is the UN's list, followed by that of the Travelers' Century Club. I've never heard of anyone using that Wiki list.
That being said - IMO these lists here on DDF are very personal and everyone should feel free to classify their travels as they see fit (see my ongoing feud with
@Dan re. airport codes for instance
). Is St. Martin/Sint Maarten a country? A territory? Or even two countries and/or territories? There is no clear answer. Some would say that since St. Martin is general parlance is not considered being in the Netherlands, it would be its own country, but a place St. Helena would not be. But that line of logic doesn't hold up to a place like Réunion, which is like a billion miles from France and considered 100% France... In any case, let each person decide for himself. No one here is gonna beat
@moish, or
@Suave, etc. anyways, so it's not a race.
Personally, I don't have any territories on my list yet (although I'll admit that listing Svalbard as a country is a slight stretch). But I will have after my Antarctica trip and so I plan to simply add a section to my list called Territories - I'd put the British Antarctic Territory there for instance, and places like Puerto Rico and American Samoa when I get to them.
And would I put St. Martin in my countries list or territories list? Who knows.