Author Topic: US Politics/2016 Election Pick Your Poison Master Thread (Read 3955754 times)

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #23780 on:** September 14, 2018, 03:25:07 PM »

Quote from: aygart on September 14, 2018, 03:22:52 PM

You have gotten well past it in the other direction here. This is Alex Jones style.
Tax evasion still does not justify a SC.

You are blaming Mueller for not possibly finding things? That makes you clueless how SC work!!!

aygart · « **Reply #23781 on:** September 14, 2018, 03:26:36 PM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on September 14, 2018, 03:25:07 PM

You are blaming Mueller for not possibly finding things?

YOU are the one who said that these convictions show it is justified.

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on September 14, 2018, 03:25:07 PM

That makes you clueless how SC work!!!

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #23782 on:** September 14, 2018, 03:27:53 PM »

Quote from: aygart on September 14, 2018, 03:21:59 PM

Be a bit honest with yourself here.
That only shows that this can be included in "matters that arose" and not that there is any additional mandate, much less 9 times what we know.

What this shows is you and the rest of the Trumpsters were drinking the Hannity Kool-Aid. You all had egg on your face and now pretend it never happen. I can dig up all the old quotes but it will make no difference.

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #23783 on:** September 14, 2018, 03:30:22 PM »

Quote from: aygart on September 14, 2018, 03:26:36 PM

YOU are the one who said that these convictions show it is justified.

You keep bringing up collusion when his mandate says nothing about collusion. It is clear who doesn't understand how the SC works or their mandate!!!
How many convictions does he need?

aygart · « **Reply #23784 on:** September 14, 2018, 03:37:45 PM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on September 14, 2018, 03:30:22 PM

You keep bringing up collusion when his mandate says nothing about collusion. It is clear who doesn't understand how the SC works or their mandate!!!
How many convictions does he need?

You are making Maddow sound middle of the road.

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #23785 on:** September 14, 2018, 03:42:05 PM »

Quote from: aygart on September 14, 2018, 03:37:45 PM

You are making Maddow sound middle of the road.

Show me where in the mandate it says he is investigating collusion? That is Trumps BS. You have no facts to backup your Hannity / Trump BS. Please stop posting like a child.

ilherman · « **Reply #23786 on:** September 14, 2018, 03:43:44 PM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on September 14, 2018, 01:19:26 PM

Stop with the Hannity nonsense. Collusion is a tenth of his mandate. This is one of the most successful investigations ever!!!

This has nothing to do with Trump, Russia, Stormy etc etx. What the hell are you smoking? Prosecutors around the country convict people on Tax fraud every day. I think by now you would be eligible to fill in for Maddow. Or is this too much non sense even for her level? I mean, there is still no proff after almost 2 years that this RUSSIA TRUMP investigation is not a witch hunt. Now, you and Maddow would bluntly answer, look how many convictions... When you so well know that not a single conviction has to do with why he was appointed SC.

And did you read the news that SC asked that george papadopoulos should get 6 months in prison. Did you read what the Judge gave him?....

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #23787 on:** September 14, 2018, 03:49:42 PM »

Quote from: ilherman on September 14, 2018, 03:43:44 PM

And did you read the news that SC asked that george papadopoulos should get 6 months in prison. Did you read what the Judge gave him?....

Most get probation in his situation. He received JAIL TIME!!! End of story!!!

aygart · « **Reply #23788 on:** September 14, 2018, 04:43:29 PM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on September 14, 2018, 03:42:05 PM

Show me where in the mandate it says he is investigating collusion? That is Trumps BS. You have no facts to backup your Hannity / Trump BS. Please stop posting like a child.

You prefer the word coordination to collusion? Explain the difference and how it affects this conversation

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on September 14, 2018, 01:32:57 PM

:any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump;

aygart · « **Reply #23789 on:** September 14, 2018, 04:48:11 PM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on September 14, 2018, 03:09:08 PM

You forget the discussion we had before PM first trial where you said they were overreaching and the judge called them liars. Of course you and everyone else what to forget about that because you were all wrong. The 100% homer judge wanted the letter showing they were not overreaching. They produce it and despite ever effort by the 100% homer judge they got serious slam-dunk convictions.

You still haven't given any source that 90% of the mandate we are not privy to or even any for that matter

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #23790 on:** September 14, 2018, 04:50:30 PM »

Quote from: aygart on September 14, 2018, 04:43:29 PM

You prefer the word coordination to collusion? Explain the difference and how it affects this conversation

Actually I prefer "links" since that is already a given.

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #23791 on:** September 14, 2018, 04:53:14 PM »

Quote from: aygart on September 14, 2018, 04:48:11 PM

You still haven't given any source that 90% of the mandate we are not privy to or even any for that matter

The letter they gave the judge expanded the investigation. We have no idea what that expansion is. The bottom line is Mueller is following his mandate. With all the smearing in the world going on they still haven't laid a glove on him.

aygart · « **Reply #23792 on:** September 14, 2018, 04:56:08 PM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on September 14, 2018, 04:53:14 PM

The letter they gave the judge expanded the investigation. We have no idea what that expansion is. The bottom line is Mueller is following his mandate. With all the smearing in the world going on they still haven't laid a glove on him.

Source that it expended by any rather than just clarified and also that it comes anywhere close too the magnitude you wrote?

aygart · « **Reply #23793 on:** September 14, 2018, 04:56:24 PM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on September 14, 2018, 04:50:30 PM

Actually I prefer "links" since that is already a given.

I have no idea what this means

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #23794 on:** September 14, 2018, 04:59:10 PM »

Quote from: aygart on September 14, 2018, 04:56:24 PM

I have no idea what this means

I guess you forgot about the Trump tower meeting. That isn't a link?

aygart · « **Reply #23795 on:** September 14, 2018, 05:01:14 PM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on September 14, 2018, 04:53:14 PM

The letter they gave the judge expanded the investigation. We have no idea what that expansion is. The bottom line is Mueller is following his mandate. With all the smearing in the world going on they still haven't laid a glove on him.

You are the only one who bought up whether or not he was following the mandate today. I know you want to deflect away and I fully understand why.

aygart · « **Reply #23796 on:** September 14, 2018, 05:02:08 PM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on September 14, 2018, 04:59:10 PM

I guess you forgot about the Trump tower meeting. That isn't a link?

A link to what?

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #23797 on:** September 14, 2018, 05:02:21 PM »

Quote from: aygart on September 14, 2018, 04:56:08 PM

Source that it expended by any rather than just clarified and also that it comes anywhere close too the magnitude you wrote?

It had to more than the original mandate otherwise it would not have been needed for the trial to go forward. How much more as I already said we are not privy to it.

You need to stop drinking the Kool-Aid thinking Mueller's mandate is to get Trump. If you can do that then maybe you can be objective.

aygart · « **Reply #23798 on:** September 14, 2018, 05:03:38 PM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on September 14, 2018, 05:02:21 PM

It had to more than the original mandate otherwise it would not have been needed for the trial to go forward. How much more as I already said we are not privy to it.

You need to stop drinking the Kool-Aid thinking Mueller's mandate is to get Trump. If you can do that then maybe you can be objective.

You are taking to yourself about his mandate since no one here besides you is discussing it.

aygart · « **Reply #23799 on:** September 14, 2018, 05:04:57 PM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on September 14, 2018, 05:02:21 PM

It had to more than the original mandate otherwise it would not have been needed for the trial to go forward. How much more as I already said we are not privy to it.

You need to stop drinking the Kool-Aid thinking Mueller's mandate is to get Trump. If you can do that then maybe you can be objective.

What is more likely is that it gave a broad definition of related matters.

Topic Wiki

Poll

Who are you voting for?

Author Topic: US Politics/2016 Election Pick Your Poison Master Thread (Read 3955754 times)