That went right over your head. I give up.
I'm amazed at how difficult it is for you to admit you were wrong. I literally caught you on two contradictory posts. You didn't read something, but know why people attacked it.
Well, your first one for starters. He's explaining why Republicans who are against impeachment are against it. Saying that some Republicans have a different view, doesn't mean that he is wrong about the perspective of those he is describing.
I genuinely don't understand the logic - he is saying Republicans are against impeachment because it is merely an attempt to cudgel them together with Trump, but voting for impeachment doesn't cudgel them with Trump, so how can the reason to vote Nay for impeachment be because you don't want to be cudgeled with Trump, when by your own admission if you vote Yay you're aren't cudgeled, and if you vote only by voting Nay you are cudgeled?
If the problem is that he shouldn't be invited to guest edit Playbook because he is a bad faith actor, then yes, you would need to show the kind of good faith actors that should be guest editing.
I think I meant something different than you by bad-faith - I meant making arguments he surely knows aren't correct. Good faith in this case for many republicans IMO is that impeachment is the right thing but will happen anyways and voting for it would accomplish nothing but hurt them with important voters, and I don't think there's anything wrong with that.
Most of your points address Shapiro's piece as if history started in January 2021. If you aren't willing to look at things objectively and see how the way the left and the media (pardon the redundancy) brought us Trump, how can you reasonably expect anyone on the right to accept any culpability for their own actions?
I'm not sure I disagree with you. My argument was solely that this statement below was wrong, and there were other reasons not to publish it.
The entire pushback was simply that they disagreed with him.