Random questions.

[yuneeq]

Should Pro-Palestina rallies/events be allowed under 1A?
It seems the goalpost are moving on this one.

Every single rally calls for genocide. I don’t see why it would be protected. Every single protestor should be arrested for incitement.

[CountValentine]

Every single rally calls for genocide.

That is not true.

I don’t see why it would be protected.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_Party_of_America_v._Village_of_Skokie

[yuneeq]

That is not true.

From the river to the sea is a genocidal chant

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_Party_of_America_v._Village_of_Skokie

No connection, if anything it proves otherwise -

“ On June 14, 1977, the Supreme Court ordered Illinois to hold a hearing on their ruling against the National Socialist Party of America, emphasizing that "if a State seeks to impose a restraint on First Amendment rights, it must provide strict procedural safeguards, including immediate appellate review. ... Absent such review, the State must instead allow a stay. The order of the Illinois Supreme Court constituted a denial of that right."[5] On remand, the Illinois Supreme Court sent the case back to the Illinois Appellate Court. The Appellate Court ruled per curiam on July 11, 1977 that the swastika was not protected by the First Amendment.[28][29] In other words, the NSPA could march, but they could not display the swastika during their march.”

[Essen est zich]

Should Pro-Palestina rallies/events be allowed under 1A?
It seems the goalpost are moving on this one.

Pro Hamas rallies you mean?

If it was pro palestine they should be protesting Hamas and not Israel.

What would you do if your neighbours were standing outside your house with their buddies and chanting with signs that they want to kill you and your entire family?

[smurf]

That is not true

Let me guess, they are all "Mostly Peaceful"

[Yehuda57]

Should Pro-Palestina rallies/events be allowed under 1A?
It seems the goalpost are moving on this one.

Please post an instance where the goalposts have moved. Pro Palestine protests, even pro Hamas protests, can and must be allowed in public spaces in accordance with the 1st amendment. Private businesses do not need to allow any protests at all. In France such protests have been outlawed, but France doesn't have freedom of speech.

Every single rally calls for genocide.

Even calls for genocide might be allowed under the 1A if there is no direct incitement, i.e. fighting words. IANAL, but I don't think "from the river to the sea" chanting would be considered fighting words even if it is genocidal in nature. Neo Nazis have the right to march with swastikas and chant the most vile genocidal things. Until it turns into fighting words it is allowed.

Major caveat: my knowledge of constitutional law comes from watching YouTube videos. I know nothing.

[CountValentine]

Pro Hamas rallies you mean?

If it was pro palestine they should be protesting Hamas and not Israel.

What would you do if your neighbours were standing outside your house with their buddies and chanting with signs that they want to kill you and your entire family?

What you are I would do is different than what is allowed under the law.

My position on Hamas is crystal clear.

[aygart]

Should Pro-Palestina rallies/events be allowed under 1A?
It seems the goalpost are moving on this one. 

Def not with river to sea types of slogans which are calling for violence and genocide

[CountValentine]

Def not with river to sea types of slogans which are calling for violence and genocide

Isn't the actual chant: from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free?

[Euclid]

Isn't the actual chant: from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free?

check out a map - where do you think theyre talking about?

[CountValentine]

check out a map - where do you think theyre talking about?

I know what they are talking about but they have plausible deniability.
Like telling someone "Fight like hell". 

ETA:The Real Meaning of “From the River to the Sea”
The meaning of these words is fraught with ambiguity and controversy.
https://jewishjournal.com/commentary/opinion/337807/the-real-meaning-of-from-the-river-to-the-sea/

[smurf]

Should Pro-Palestina rallies/events be allowed under 1A?
It seems the goalpost are moving on this one.

Goalposts were long moved when college campuses blocked/cancelled conservative speakers, because it made people feel "unsafe"
Because one guy saying a man is a man is far more scary then hundreds screaming "gas the jews"

[CountValentine]

Goalposts were long moved when college campuses blocked/cancelled conservative speakers, because it made people feel "unsafe"

I didn't agree with that.

[Alexsei]

Goalposts were long moved when college campuses blocked/cancelled conservative speakers, because it made people feel "unsafe"
Because one guy saying a man is a man is far more scary then hundreds screaming "gas the jews"

Why do we think that goal posts are a stationary thing?

[Yehuda57]

Why do we think that goal posts are a stationary thing?

Why do we think that an idiom with a specific meaning has that meaning?

[Alexsei]

Why do we think that an idiom with a specific meaning has that meaning?

Ok so we're using the wrong idiom (goal posts from soccer) as it is almost always used in reference to goals that are not stationary at all

[Yehuda57]

Ok so we're using the wrong idiom (goal posts from soccer) as it is almost always used in reference to goals that are not stationary at all

What are you talking about? I'm seriously confused. If anything I was wrong to call it an idiom as goalposts literally are stationary

[smurf]

I didn't agree with that.

I didn't either. Please link me to your post on whether conservative speech is protected by 1A, So i can give it a Like.

[Alexsei]

What are you talking about? I'm seriously confused. If anything I was wrong to call it an idiom as goalposts literally are stationary

We're constantly using the term "moving goal posts" in political discussions, usually in arguments, when in fact there term goal posts don't even apply to this, as the morals and objectives are designed to constantly change. There are no goal posts and there are no moving them.

[CountValentine]

Ok so we're using the wrong idiom (goal posts from soccer) as it is almost always used in reference to goals that are not stationary at all

Not this soccer thing again. 
FOOTBALL!!!