I count on plan A to delay what might be the only viable action at some point.Now if you believe the current admin would not use all means possible to stop them from getting a nuke then that is a different situation.
It is likely that the only administration in recent years who would have conducted a military operation to end Iran's nuclear weapons program, would be the Bush administration prior to the Iraq war.
Why would they take military action when Iran is not at that point yet?
What point?
Tomorrow they will have a nuke.
Why would they wait until then?
If they are that close windows of opportunity are unreliable and failures would be disastrous.
The peanut farmer is long gone.
https://twitter.com/MorningsMaria/status/1506620353287798791
https://twitter.com/AcrossTheBay/status/1507403831977648132
Odd they mention appeasement. What about Israel appeasement towards Russia. That would seem like real danger, no?
sure, because Israel gets in Russias way as much as US does in Iran's.Yup, those are similar
So you are going to ignore the fact that appeasing a murderous dictator with nukes is not dangerous? I am 100% sure you don't need a history lesson.
Least of all to have any moral or other basis to make demands are the spinless, fickle friends of US foreign policy
Appeasement is us blocking migs