US Politics/2016 Election Pick Your Poison Master Thread

[Yammer]

You live if your fake reality so why not.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/white-house-considers-arguing-that-trump-wasnt-impeached/ar-BBYczX2?ocid=spartandhp

Why are you so positive that it's a fake reality? I have absolutely no idea what the actual reality is, as it's never been analyzed up until today... and would love to see what ends up happening.

Keep drinking the Kool-Aid if you think Trump is not immoral. Anyone who believes that would you be ok with him being a father figure for your children. Lets see who has the courage to answer that question. 
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/billy-graham-s-son-says-it-s-unfathomable-christianity-today-would-side-with-democrats-in-totally-partisan-attack-on-trump/ar-BBYcj5p?ocid=msn360

I don't think the question was if Billy Graham thinks that DJT is morale or not. The point was that DJT wasn't immoral on the 2 articles of impeachment in Billy Graham's eyes ( according to his son ).

You are missing the point. You are telling everyone not to believe their eyes and ears but this mumbo jumbo legal stuff I am going to feed you. You better serve them the Kool-Aid first. 

At the current moment from a PR prospective it's a 0 as he's impeached according to everyone in the country. But...leave it up to Trump to get the legal scholars + Media into a frenzy debate about this...

[CountValentine]

Why are you so positive that it's a fake reality?

You answered your own question.

...he's impeached according to everyone in the country.

I don't think the question was if Billy Graham thinks that DJT is morale or not. The point was that DJT wasn't immoral on the 2 articles of impeachment in Billy Graham's eyes ( according to his son ).

I don't see anywhere in the article where BG or his son said Trump wasn't immoral. If either of them believe that then they corrupted their religion. The point of the article was CT can no longer say silent. Graham/Trump/Kool-Aid drinkers are trying to discredit CT and anyone tells the truth about this immoral president as being left-wing democrats. The truth is CT is not a left-wing democrat publication.

Let me ask you a question. According to Judaism what would be the definition of immoral?

[zh cohen]

You are missing the point. You are telling everyone not to believe their eyes and ears but this mumbo jumbo legal stuff I am going to feed you. You better serve them the Kool-Aid first. 

A wise man once said  'It isn't so much that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so many things that aren't so.'

[CountValentine]

A wise man once said  'It isn't so much that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so many things that aren't so.'

Your problem and the other Kool-Aid drinkers is anti-SCUMBAG president equals liberal.
A good conman once said he could shoot someone in cold blood on 5th ave and they still wouldn't go against him. Sound familiar? 

[Toasted]

Your problem and the other Kool-Aid drinkers is anti-SCUMBAG president equals liberal.
A good conman once said he could shoot someone in cold blood on 5th ave and they still wouldn't go against him. Sound familiar? 

So you're saying that even though he wasn't legally impeached that doesn't matter since you really really want to hashtag him impotus?

[CountValentine]

So you're saying that even though he wasn't legally impeached that doesn't matter since you really really want to hashtag him impotus?

He wasn't legally impeached? What Kool-Aid you drinking? ROFLMAO!!!
#IMPOTUS

ETA: If any Kool-Aid drinkers need it dumbed down just let me know. 
Chapter 27, Section 8 says, “The respondent in an impeachment proceeding is impeached by the adoption of the House of articles of impeachment.”

...and for those that want to be objective you might want to read this: https://jonathanturley.org/2019/12/20/trump-was-impeached-a-response-to-noah-feldman/

[Toasted]

I have no interest in mastering the mumbo jumbo. All I know is that there's disagreement between the experts. Just because you want it a certain way, doesn't mean that it's settled law.
On a side note, we already have a singer for the 2021 inauguration. I'm sure you'll enjoy him if you'll be watching.
https://greaterlakewood.com/beri-weber-i-was-at-loss-of-words-when-he-told-me-that-i-sang-so-well-that-he-can-see-me-singing-it-at-his-second-inauguration/

[CountValentine]

I have no interest in mastering the mumbo jumbo. All I know is that there's disagreement between the experts. Just because you want it a certain way, doesn't mean that it's settled law.

The constitution is short and sweet on this. Read it for yourself. Put down the Kool-Aid and open your eyes.

#IMPOTUS

[CountValentine]

All I know is that there's disagreement between the experts.

FOX news is not considered experts. 

[Toasted]

I'm citing experts at Bloomberg and WSJ. I believe one was a Democrat called expert witness at one of the hearings. Don't be fooled into thinking it's straight forward.

[Toasted]

Don't hyperventilate at whatever MSDNC is feeding you. How did the dozens of Russia investigation BOMBSHELL ALERTs work out?

[CountValentine]

I'm citing experts at Bloomberg and WSJ. I believe one was a Democrat called expert witness at one of the hearings. Don't be fooled into thinking it's straight forward.

You are picking your so called experts. Use the brain G-d gave you and think for yourself. Did you read the constitution about impeachment?
You are trying to find a way 2+2 doesn't equal 4. You are just showing that the Kool-Aid is effecting your brain.

#IMPOTUS

ETA: The House of Representatives shall choose their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

[CountValentine]

How did the dozens of Russia investigation BOMBSHELL ALERTs work out?

Don't shoot the messenger. 

Lets test if you are just another troll, Kool-Aid drinker or really can think for yourself.
Do you feel/think Trump is immoral?

[Boruch999]

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-real-cable-news-bias-isnt-what-you-think-2019-12-17

[CountValentine]

Another failed policy just like Iran that the Kool-aid drinkers will not face up to.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/rhetorical-policy-bolton-says-trump-administration-is-bluffing-on-vow-to-denuclearize-north-korea/ar-BBYfP6p?li=BBnb7Kz

[aygart]

He wasn't legally impeached? What Kool-Aid you drinking? ROFLMAO!!!
#IMPOTUS

ETA: If any Kool-Aid drinkers need it dumbed down just let me know. 
Chapter 27, Section 8 says, “The respondent in an impeachment proceeding is impeached by the adoption of the House of articles of impeachment.”

...and for those that want to be objective you might want to read this: https://jonathanturley.org/2019/12/20/trump-was-impeached-a-response-to-noah-feldman/

So objective means to ignore the legal scholar the Dems brought in when his opinions don't suit you? Got it.

[aygart]

FOX news is not considered experts. 

How about Noah Feldman? DOes he qualify?

[CountValentine]

So objective means to ignore the legal scholar the Dems brought in when his opinions don't suit you? Got it.

Don't ignore anything. Like the legal scholar I linked to that was against impeachment.

Better yet try using your mind.
What part of this are you confused with or don't understand?
"The respondent in an impeachment proceeding is impeached by the adoption of the House of articles of impeachment."

For someone who claims he is not a supporter of Trump you defend him at every turn. 

[CountValentine]

How about Noah Feldman? DOes he qualify?

If you can't find legal scholars that disagree then you are not looking very hard.
Please show me any part of the constitution that supports his view?

[aygart]

Don't ignore anything. Like the legal scholar I linked to that was against impeachment.

Better yet try using your mind.
What part of this are you confused with or don't understand?
"The respondent in an impeachment proceeding is impeached by the adoption of the House of articles of impeachment."

For someone who claims he is not a supporter of Trump you defend him at every turn. 

I see only legal disagreement that is not very relevant in any way. What does the title of impeached do anyway? Allow a stupid hashtag?

You seem to be forgetting that I had written that this was something problematic even if there was no quid pro quo.
There is only one person here who is cherry picking opinions.