( My initial response was typed up in the middle of the night while trying to get one of my newborn twins to fall asleep B"H)
Mazel Tov! Go back to the babies! (Or back to sleep)
this conversation that you started was not about a person that received this request, misunderstood and was mortified ,rather it was about the perception of the issue by people…
Good, we totally agree, that's exactly what I've been talking about - how the issue is perceived by others. I responded to two posts which seemed to ask that very question:
I have seen comments from people sticking up for Neria saying that even if it didn't happen, it certainly could have happened. I don't doubt that, but what is their point?
So then you smile and say "I'm sorry, I chose this seat and I'm going to stay here" and move on. I'm really not getting the part where it becomes "how dare he have the nerve to think of asking me".
I've been trying to explain how this issue is perceived by the X/tweeters and some women who are asked to switch seats.
It’s been stated repeatedly that some men have a religious view that they must keep far from unrelated women, and that part is clear. The question is how does that man act when he enters a public space where this view conflicts with those of others. The first step in resolving a conflict is for both parties to understand each others’ perspective, and that’s where I tried to enter the conversation, to try to see the other side.
S209 argues that we don’t have to try to understand the others’ perspective, because we are certain that we know what it is: Chiloni simply hate Chareidi. I don’t find that a completely satisfying explanation. If the disagreement were simply due to pre-existing hatred, I would expect to hear from chareidi passengers who begin to approach their seat near a chiloni and they are asked to switch and sit elsewhere. Maybe this happens, but if so it hasn't been mentioned here.
Imayid2 argues that if the woman perceives the situation differently from the man, then he should explain himself again until she sees things from his viewpoint. This doesn’t answer the question, which was to try to understand her perspective in the first place.
I suggested that a possible explanation for why women (in this theoretical situation) may not just smile back is because they see the very request as impolite. Is this a better explanation? I don't know. Ask them.
DavidR, admirably, asks how he can achieve this goal of sitting only near men:
I would appreciate it if anyone could clarify. If I am uncomfortable sitting next to someone for religious reasons, what should I do?
And EliJelly and Dan responded with some methods that would not be perceived as offensive:
Of course there are polite ways to go about it and there are dumb and uncivil ways too. Personally I think the optimal way is not to ask her to change seats, rather to change your own seat with a solo frum woman flying on the flight who is much more likely to be sympathetic to such a request.
If the issue is sitting in between 2 people, then pay for the aisle or window.
I hate to say it, but if you have a bona fide religious conviction against the possibility of sitting next to someone, why is it different then when we pay double for kosher food or kosher wine or tuition?
Buy an extra seat and you'll avoid all drama. Plus you'll be a lot more comfortable.
I understand not everyone can afford that, but travel is a luxury in the first place.
Although I can imagine other ways.