I can't recall where I read this, but it said this mutation is 70% more contagious.
yes but not 100% conclusive
In every article
But I only read it in one at the end of last week 😉.I see by today all the articles are quoting that 70% so I'm not going to be posting a bunch of links. They aren't even sure of that anyway. Just says "could be" and/or "up to" 70% more...
https://twitter.com/jcbarret/status/1341126582660939777?s=21
https://twitter.com/kerpen/status/1341096711691878401?s=21The modeling came from Neil Ferguson.. come on!
Will the vaccine work for this strain?
It's amazing that alarmism is the default popular position.
Where?
By governments resounding to this "development" for one.
Same way there is little data proving that the variant is more transmissible, there is even less data that the modeling comes from Ferguson. Seems like they jumped from Ferguson being present at the meeting to him being responsible
Anything that has anything to do with Niel Ferguson is tainted.
So, if we have real data (I'm not saying there is here) that this is more transmissible - we ignore it because some idiot was at the meeting?