https://www.kramim.info/article/ואינה-תשובה-שאלה-של-יושרה-אקדמית-תגובה/10203685
I think this entire thread (and similar ones) can be summed up with the following short paragraphs:
Human nature is to project one's own set of values, expected actions and reactions, on others.
At hand here are to value systems/cultures.
One that is committed to truth at all costs, even if those costs are uncomfortable or detrimental.
On the other side is one that puts self-aggrandizement above all values, and has very little, if any regard to truth and honesty. They also, for some odd reason, feel threatened and incapable of acknowledging and applauding merits of those that ascribe to a different culture and set of values. And when facts stand in the way of self-aggrandizement, that is dealt with through lies, distortions, or distractions.
So the result is a pointless argument, because one side is accusing and suspecting the other of dishonesty, forgery and embellishment (which would be the accusing side's way of dealing with something uncomfortable), while the accused side is expecting honesty and truth to convince (and would have never even found any discomfort with the fact, let alone seeing a need to distort).