This response wraps things up nicely. You know of so many cases where the woman is treated unfairly, because those are the cases championed by activists. This thread is full of people trying to counter that narrative, not saying that the men are right in those cases, but that women don't have a monopoly on the short end of the stick. Those posts led you to say:
This is the danger in one-sided narratives. You don't even disagree with what most of the posters here have said. Put in proper context, there are agreed upon issues with the divorce system, and they don't necessarily have solutions. But by framing the issue as one-sided, anyone trying to present another side to get a fuller picture is now branded as a woman hater.
Maybe you're right, I will take definitely think it over.
But you are wrong that that is what I am horrified about. I don't think women are always right at all.
I was shocked by some of the sentiments displayed, such as the below:
“From the Torah's perspective, a wife is property and a husband isn't obligated to divorce his wife at all, so he's entitled to ask for whatever he wants in return for relinquishing his ownership. The accepted norms of decent behavior evolved and it is now considered abusive to maintain a marriage against the wife's wishes, but that is a departure from the Torah”
“ This is completely hepach hatorah and it's the way feminism has infiltrated much of the frum world.”
“ There is no reason he should be forced to give her a get so she has nothing stopping her from dragging him through the mud”