Fact - In the letter written by R Shalom it says that the husband was mechyuv to give a get.
I dispute what was written.
Fact - I provided a link to where the reader can find a letter written by the DC Vaad stating "First, at this time there is no Bet Din order for Mr. Friedman to give a get" (you can go on to read the rest of the letter which says that the Baltimore Bais Din has and had jurisdiction in this case)
If you can provide a psak din from a Bais Din that has actual jurisdiction in this case to collaborate the claim from R' Shalom than please do share.
If I present facts that don't agree with your preconceived outcome doesn't mean I only attack - your reaction seems to indicate that you may have a hard time swallowing the truth.
Let us assume that no bais din gave a psak that he is mechuyav to give a get. This is still a far cry from your attacks on them. Anyone who reads your posts in this thread can see that this was the sole fact which you posted. That you are claiming this as proof that you are posting no attacks only facts shows how ridiculous your statements are. After calling them all names in the book you mention one small fact which even if 100% true as you presented it does not even come close to justifying your attacks.
I addition I will point out that the date of the letter you posted is in 2010, a good few years before he wrote that the B'D paskened that he is mechuyav. The letter itself specifically states "at this time".
I have no pre-conceived outcome here. On the other hand, before writing the way you did about a Rosh Yeshiva there is a high standard of evidence required. You have not presented any such evidence. As I wrote before,
All it will take is for you to come out of hiding and present facts
You have not yet done so.