such has never happened even once
That's exactly the problem. It happens all the time but you are so incredibly convinced of your beliefs that no matter how much evidence to the contrary is presented, you can't be swayed. Unlike you, every position of mine is subject to modification if presented with enough evidence. When you come with that approach, you realize that a lot of things we take for granted (like Jews are always right and Arabs are always evil) aren't always 100% so, and your positions gradually become more aligned with the truth, as opposed to what you were fed as a child and shared by 90%+ of your environment without ever scrutinizing fairly.
Here are 3 recent times that come to mind:
1)
Please explain to us how exactly דרישה וחקירה would 'knock out' an honest testimony of a single witness? Never mind 99% of them.
It can only void witnesses who contradict each other. That's besides the fact דרישה וחקירה is probably not needed, although there is very little resources on the topic so I probably won't be able to prove it absolutely.
If you aren't willing to walk back a statement even after you know it's wrong, how can anybody respect anything you say?
2)
if the torah says to do it then there is nothing to be embarrassed of
Chilul hashem applies to (some) things perceived by non-Jews as wrong even if the Torah says to do them, and I can prove it.
(Toisfos is conclusive, the others are illustrative)
....
תוספות על גיטין מ״ו א:ז׳:א׳
לר' יהודה איך הניחום בארץ הכתיב (שמות כ״ג:ל״ג) לא ישבו בארצך וגו' והוה ליה נשבע לבטל את המצוה וע"כ משום חילול השם הוא
3)
If you accept that the victor of a war can void previous ownership of land and award it as they wish, the rightful owners are those accepted by the Jordanian victors.
if u accept that then the current israeli victors are the rightful owners
The current Arab residents in East Jerusalem are Israeli nationals. They are protectorates of the winning power just as much as the Jews attempting to evict them.
jews and arabs are not equal under israeli law.
as much as we try painting a picture that they are. they are not.
we dont consider them equal, neither do they consider themselves as such.
they dont have any right of return laws
....
there are no budgets for "arabizing" the north or south.
the list is endless
they are merely tolerated here because of the lack of ability/will to get rid of them
those trying to evict them are not doing so as part of a personal legal financial battle, but are doing so bec they believe it is in the good of the state
if they are protected by the winning power it is not bec they are part of the winning power, but bec the winning power didnt win hard enough.
these are all facts
every zionist knows and feels this way, even if he will vehemently scream and yell that they are false.
Again, nobody said it's illegal or not right. The point which you attempted to dispute is that from an Arab point of view it's unfair. I'm happy you conceded that argument and shifted to showing other instances where Israeli law discriminates against Arabs.
This is the kind of scoreboard I wish we had.
Maybe at a certain mass you'd start realizing some of the things you are so convinced about aren't always 100% correct, as I do about my perceptions.
It's actually quite amazing that you literally believe you are always 100% right. I don't think I know a single other person like that.
