You're horribly misapplying shas hashmad and yaharog v'al yaavor here. In shas hashmad you keep your minhagim even if 'they' will kill you because of it. This is a situation where the minhag may kill you, not 'them'.
Yup, I can’t see how this is similar to the red shoelace. It might very well be a שב ואל תעשה עדיף.
One might argue that what’s happening in Meron could set a precedent, but that’s not the same as שעת השמד FWIU
I agree that the case is not completely comparable, as the direct threat of death is not coming from the Zionist, but from flooding the mountain. But I think it may still fall under the same halachic directive, to stand up for a minhag when there are those trying to undermine it, even at a threat to personal safety.
I don't want to go in circles here, especially because I don't necessarily agree with the thing I am saying. I merely put it out there as a possible perspective for what the Eidah is doing, though the Eidah does not need me to defend them.
I am not interested in just rehashing this, though I'll try to respond if anyone feels compelled to ask something.