The Tamar Epstein Saga

[rileywiles23]

Maybe because there are some militant modernah feminists on here, who attack people who oppose woman's right to whatever..

If what I wrote is wrong, then please refute it. If what I wrote does have merit, then why would it matter what other username I have?

Therefore just stick with whatever persona you go by here.

[aygart]

Maybe because there are some militant modernah feminists on here, who attack people who oppose woman's right to whatever..

So if you make up a user name then they will not attack?

[ADG]

Is someone going to update the wiki on this saga:)

[Avrumi#1]

Therefore just stick with whatever persona you go by here.

Why? What difference does it make to you?

[aygart]

Why? What difference does it make to you?

It shows that you yourself do not believe what you are saying to place at a minimum your DDF reputation on the line.

[rileywiles23]

Why? What difference does it make to you?

It shows that you yourself do not believe what you are saying to place at a minimum your DDF reputation on the line.

[churnbabychurn]

To to make something clear. Avrumi#1 is not me.

I was just saying that understand why he is not interested in becoming a target on every thread.

[Aaaron]

To to make something clear. Avrumi#1 is not me.

I was just saying that understand why he is not interested in becoming a target on every thread.

I don't get it.  A handful of people here know me in real life and know my stances.  A bunch more here "know" me and my positions, and the same goes for most regulars here.  What's the point of creating another name?

ETA: and to clarify, Avrumi#1 isn't me either even though that's my nickname. 

[churnbabychurn]

I don't get it.  A handful of people here know me in real life and know my stances.  A bunch more here "know" me and my positions, and the same goes for most regulars here.  What's the point of creating another name?

ETA: and to clarify, Avrumi#1 isn't me either even though that's my nickname.

Don't worry, no one was choshed that it's you

[David Smith]

I don't get it.  A handful of people here know me in real life and know my stances.  A bunch more here "know" me and my positions, and the same goes for most regulars here.  What's the point of creating another name?

ETA: and to clarify, Avrumi#1 isn't me either even though that's my nickname. 

No kidding, it's not you.

[Boruch999]

Not me either.  If enough people chime in we can figure out who it is by process of elimination.

[churnbabychurn]

See pet peeves thread for a clue

[yuneeq]

Don't understand why people are bashing the use of alternate accounts.
Most people here use anonymous usernames, and no one here has any issue with that.
Some people don't feel anonymous with their current accounts and use an alternate account,
and for some reason that's what takes over the convo.

[henche]

Don't understand why people are bashing the use of alternate accounts.
Most people here use anonymous usernames, and no one here has any issue with that.
Some people don't feel anonymous with their current accounts and use an alternate account,
and for some reason that's what takes over the convo.

For example, if I would post in JS under my usual username, it would hijack all the conversation when I post awesome deals on the main site.

[AJK]

Don't understand why people are bashing the use of alternate accounts.
Most people here use anonymous usernames, and no one here has any issue with that.
Some people don't feel anonymous with their current accounts and use an alternate account,
and for some reason that's what takes over the convo.

Really? You really don't understand the hypocrisy inherent in someone creating a second name just so he or she can "speak freely" about controversial topics so as not to besmirch his or her sterling reputation?

Either man-up, or shut-up.

/.02

[Yehuda57]

Really? You really don't understand the hypocrisy inherent in someone creating a second name just so he or she can "speak freely" about controversial topics so as not to besmirch his or her sterling reputation?

Either man-up, or shut-up.

/.02

As a now defunct blog used to say when requiring you to login to comment, "if it's not worth putting your name behind, it's probably not worth saying."

[Avrumi#1]

It shows that you yourself do not believe what you are saying to place at a minimum your DDF reputation on the line.

What is it that I said that you take issue with? Pretty much, the only problem you have is with me personally. Let's take me and you out of this and leave it to the actual issue at hand. Thank you for understanding. 

[Avrumi#1]

Really? You really don't understand the hypocrisy inherent in someone creating a second name just so he or she can "speak freely" about controversial topics so as not to besmirch his or her sterling reputation?

Either man-up, or shut-up.

/.02

Hypocrisy? Was I speaking about a person going anonymous on a board that's anonymous to begin with? Was I speaking about my moral standards? Are my moral standards relevant to this discussion?

hy·poc·ri·sy
həˈpäkrəsē/
noun
the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense.

Now, to enlighten you AJK: I understood quite well that you have certain positions that are based on emotion and are illogical. I understood quite well that when you cannot defend those positions, you choose to shoot the messenger and launch into ad hominem attacks. In fact, all you did over here was still attempt to discredit anything I write with an ad hominem, despite the fact that you haven't a clue who I am. Sheeesh.

So buddy, either put up a logical argument about the topic at hand, or just shut up on this one. Gracias!

[Ergel]

Is it really dead? Rumor has it that she has no intention of separating.

Rachmanah litzlan. Is that true?

[SayWhat]

These also is the possibility that there are some individuals that don't have DDF usernames and had to create one to join the discussion. Just because they have a new name doesn't make what they have to say any less credible.